Materials Comparison for High Speed Rotary Seals
Materials Comparison for High Speed Rotary Seals
I draw on decades of field experience in seal selection, tribology testing and custom seal development to compare materials used in high speed rotary seals. In this article I explain how material properties, seal design, shaft finish and lubrication interact to determine performance at elevated surface speeds. I provide actionable guidance you can use to select materials (PTFE, filled PTFE, NBR, FKM, silicone, EPDM, FFKM), interpret PV limits, design for thermal and wear management, and plan validation tests. Authoritative sources (SKF, ISO and material technical references) are linked throughout for verification.
Key performance drivers in rotating sealing applications
Speed, PV and friction: what really limits a seal
When I assess a rotary sealing problem the first numbers I ask for are shaft surface speed (m/s), the expected differential pressure, temperature, and the presence or absence of fluid film or lubrication. The common shorthand engineers use is the PV limit — the product of pressure (P) and sliding speed (V) — which approximates the thermal and wear stress on a contact seal. For elastomer and PTFE-based seals PV behavior is a practical guide to material limits; for reference-level background on tribology concepts see Tribology (Wikipedia).
Surface finish, runout and micro-cavitation
Shaft finish (Ra, Rz) and geometric runout control whether the seal rides on a thin lubricant film or runs boundary lubrication. In my experience, high-speed rotary seals benefit from controlled surface finishes (often Ra 0.2–0.8 µm depending on material) and minimal eccentricity—otherwise you get local heating, extrusion and accelerated wear. Guidance on shaft surface specification is available from major seal vendors and bearing suppliers such as SKF.
Lubrication, media and temperature management
Whether the seal contacts oil, grease, process fluids or dry atmospheres dramatically changes acceptable materials. Liquids that provide boundary or mixed lubrication will raise acceptable speed limits; dry running requires low-friction materials like filled PTFE or specialty coatings. Thermal conduction to housings and the availability of oil cooling are also key. ISO standards and industry datasheets outline temperature bands for common elastomers—see ISO for standards context.
Material-by-material comparison
How I compare materials
I evaluate materials according to typical operating speed ranges, continuous temperature limits, friction coefficient (qualitative), wear resistance, chemical compatibility and typical applications. The table below summarizes practical guidance; values are typical ranges derived from vendor data, technical literature and my field testing experience. For detailed polymer chemistry see: PTFE, NBR, FKM and general material references.
| Material | Typical continuous temp (°C) | Practical surface speed (m/s) | Friction / Wear | Typical strengths / notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virgin PTFE | -200 to +260 | up to 15–20 m/s (with good lubrication) | Very low friction; moderate wear if unsupported | Excellent chemical resistance; needs backup/rigid support; cold flow risk under pressure |
| Filled PTFE (bronze, carbon, MoS₂, glass) | -100 to +260 (depending on filler) | up to 20–30 m/s (best for high-speed rotary) | Lower wear than virgin PTFE; controlled friction | Improved wear resistance, reduced creep; commonly used for high-speed oil seals |
| NBR (Nitrile) | -40 to +100 | typically up to 3–7 m/s | Moderate friction; wears faster at high speeds | Excellent oil resistance; low cost; limited high-temperature performance |
| FKM (Viton) | -20 to +200 (some grades 250) | typically up to 5–10 m/s | Good wear resistance; low to moderate friction | Excellent heat and chemical resistance; common in hydraulic rotary seals |
| Silicone | -60 to +180 | low to moderate speeds (≤3–5 m/s) | Low friction but poor wear in abrasive or high-PV | Good temp extremes; poor mechanical wear resistance |
| EPDM | -50 to +150 | low speeds (≤3–5 m/s) | Moderate wear | Excellent steam/acid resistance; poor oil resistance |
| FFKM (Perfluoroelastomer) | -20 to +300 | moderate to high (varies with compound; often ≤10–15 m/s) | Very good wear; low friction; expensive | Highest chemical/thermal performance among elastomers; used in aggressive environments |
Table notes: speed ranges are practical engineering guidelines and depend strongly on lubrication, seal geometry and shaft finish. For polymer property baselines see the PTFE and elastomer references linked earlier and vendor technical data sheets (e.g., SKF product literature).
PTFE vs elastomers: trade-offs I watch
In many high-speed rotary designs the primary choice reduces to PTFE (or filled PTFE) vs an elastomeric lip seal. PTFE-based seals offer the lowest friction and highest speed capability when supported with proper backup rings and housings; however, they require precision bores/shafts and are less forgiving of misalignment. Elastomers provide better sealing elasticity, ease of installation and dynamic sealing at low speeds, but they typically wear faster and incur higher friction losses at speed. I often recommend hybrid solutions: a PTFE sliding ring on the shaft with elastomer energizer or a composite seal with PTFE running surface and an elastomer spring for face loading.
Testing, selection and design considerations
Laboratory tests and field validation I rely on
A good selection process always includes lab-level PV testing, friction/wear bench tests and ideally accelerated field trials. When I design tests I run: (1) dry and lubricated PV ramps to failure, (2) temperature-rise tests under realistic sealing pressures, (3) chemical exposure for swelling/compatibility, and (4) shaft/runout tolerance sweeps. Standard test methods and industry guidance can be found through vendor whitepapers and standards organizations—see ISO and material manufacturer test reports.
Static vs dynamic sealing and use of back-up rings
High-speed rotary seals may require back-up rings to prevent extrusion and to support PTFE under pressure. Back-up rings (often made of PTFE blends or rigid polymers) are essential where lip seals face pressure differentials. I always check seal extrusion gaps and consider installing anti-extrusion rings when pressure × temperature conditions approach material limits.
Installation, shaft finish and housing tolerances
Installation protocols matter: a small nick on a seal lip or improper gland width will reduce life dramatically. I insist on shaft hardness (if running against PTFE) ≥ HRC 35–45 or equivalent surface treatments, and I specify finish and concentricity tolerances in drawing notes. For guidance on mechanical seal installation refer to manufacturer technical manuals (e.g., SKF).
Why Polypac — capabilities and how I use their solutions
Polypac overview and technical credentials
Polypac is a scientific and technical hydraulic seal manufacturer and oil seal supplier specializing in seal production, sealing material development, and customized sealing solutions for special working conditions. Polypac's custom rubber ring and O-ring factory covers an area of more than 10,000 square meters, with a factory space of 8,000 square meters. Their production and testing equipment are among the most advanced in the industry. As one of the largest companies in China dedicated to the production and development of seals, Polypac maintains long-term communication and cooperation with numerous universities and research institutions both domestically and internationally.
Product breadth — what I specify from Polypac
Founded in 2008, Polypac began by manufacturing filled PTFE seals, including bronze-filled PTFE, carbon-filled PTFE, graphite PTFE, MoS₂-filled PTFE, and glass-filled PTFE. Today, they have expanded their product line to include O-rings made from various materials such as NBR, FKM, silicone, EPDM, and FFKM. Polypac's main products I have specified in projects include O-Rings, Rod Seals, Piston Seals, End Face Spring Seals, Scraper Seals, Rotary Seals, Back-up Rings and Dust Rings.
Competitive differentiators and use cases
From my consulting experience the things that set Polypac apart are: (1) an early and deep competency in filled PTFE formulation (critical for high-speed rotary applications), (2) in-house materials development allowing tailored compounds for specific media and PV conditions, and (3) substantial production/testing capacity enabling custom prototypes and scale-up. I often engage Polypac when an application demands an optimized filled PTFE running surface combined with elastomeric secondary seals, or when high-temperature chemical resistance rules out standard elastomers. Their collaborations with research institutions mean they can co-develop tested solutions rather than rely on off-the-shelf parts.
Practical selection checklist I use with clients
Step 1 — define operating envelope
- Record shaft surface speed (m/s), differential pressure, and temperature range.
- Identify the fluid/media and whether lubrication is present continuously.
Step 2 — choose candidate materials
- For high speed with lubrication: start with filled PTFE candidates for low friction.
- If temperature/chemistry favors elastomers: consider FKM or FFKM for higher T and chemical resistance.
Step 3 — validate with PV and compatibility tests
- Run PV ramps, friction and temperature-rise tests under representative housing conditions.
- Confirm installation tolerances and shaft finish; include backup rings if pressure or extrusion risk exists.
FAQ
- Q1: What is the maximum surface speed for PTFE rotary seals?
- A1: Practically, filled PTFE seals can handle surface speeds up to ~20–30 m/s under good lubrication and with proper support/back-up rings. Virgin PTFE may be lower in wear life without fillers. Exact limits depend on PV, lubrication and shaft finish; vendor PV data should be consulted for design margins. See PTFE properties: PTFE (Wikipedia).
- Q2: When should I choose FKM over PTFE for a rotary seal?
- A2: Choose FKM when you need elastomeric sealing (flexibility, simple lip sealing) combined with elevated temperature and hydrocarbon resistance but at moderate speeds (typically ≤10 m/s). When minimal friction and highest speeds are required, PTFE or filled PTFE is usually better.
- Q3: Are filled PTFE seals compatible with abrasive fluids?
- A3: Filled PTFE compounds (bronze, carbon, glass, MoS₂) improve wear resistance versus virgin PTFE, but abrasive particles will still accelerate wear. In abrasive media I recommend filtration, sacrificial liners or hardened shaft surfaces and to validate with bench wear tests under representative contamination levels.
- Q4: How important is shaft surface finish?
- A4: Very important. For PTFE sliding surfaces I typically specify a ground/honed finish with Ra often between 0.2–0.8 µm depending on material and lubrication. Too rough increases wear; too smooth (mirror) may reduce lubricant retention. Always match finish to material vendor recommendations.
- Q5: What testing should I request from a seal supplier?
- A5: Ask for PV test data, friction (torque) vs speed curves, temperature-rise at operating pressure, chemical compatibility/swelling data, and results from accelerated life tests. For safety-critical applications, require third-party or witnessed testing in representative rigs.
- Q6: Can I retrofit a rotary seal from an elastomer to PTFE?
- A6: Sometimes yes, but account for differences: PTFE requires more precise glands, may need back-up rings, and the shaft surface/hardness must be suitable. Evaluate thermal expansion and make sure the housing can provide the required support.
If you need help specifying a high speed rotary seal, I can assist with material selection, PV testing plans and detailed drawing notes. For custom manufacturing and advanced filled PTFE compounds I recommend contacting Polypac — they have deep experience and production capacity for both prototype and large-volume needs. Explore their product lines (O-Rings, Rod Seals, Piston Seals, End Face Spring Seals, Scraper Seals, Rotary Seals, Back-up Rings, Dust Rings) and request tested samples for your application.
Contact / Request a quote
If you want help selecting materials or need samples/test units for validation, contact our technical team or request Polypac product information and custom development support. I can prepare a PV test plan and material shortlist once you provide speed, pressure, temperature and media details.
References and further reading:
- Tribology overview: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribology
- Polytetrafluoroethylene properties: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polytetrafluoroethylene
- Nitrile rubber and fluoroelastomer references: NBR, FKM
- Industry product and application guidance: SKF
- Standards body: ISO
High-Performance Pneumatic Piston Seals: How to Achieve Zero-Leakage Efficiency
PTFE vs. Composite: Choosing the Best Piston Guide Ring Material for High-Pressure Systems
Mastering O-Ring Gland Design: The Complete Guide for Perfect Sealing Performance
Advanced Back-Up Ring Materials: Beyond PTFE for Extreme Temperature Environments
PTFE vs. Urethane Scrapers: Which Material Truly Prevents Contamination?
Products
What does "AS568" mean?
What is the purpose of the metal spring in a rotary shaft seal?
What is the difference between NBR and FKM materials?
How important is surface finish on the metal parts that contact the seal?
Can I reuse a seal?
Stay Updated with Industry Insights
Subscribe to our articles and receive the latest news, expert guidance, and technical updates directly in your E-mail.
Rest assured that your privacy is important to us, and all information provided will be handled with the utmost confidentiality.
© 2025 Polypac Seals. All Rights Reserved.
dms
DMS
DMS